In the situation described, what have the Johnsons accused the town of when their liquor license was revoked?

The Johnsons have accused the town of inverse condemnation after their liquor license was revoked. Inverse condemnation is a legal concept where a property owner believes that their property has been effectively taken or devalued by government action without formal condemnation proceedings or just compensation. In this situation, the revocation of their liquor license can be seen as a governmental action that diminishes the value of their business, leading them to claim that their property rights have been infringed upon.

This concept is crucial because it highlights how governmental actions can impact private property rights, making it essential for property owners to seek redress when they feel those rights have been violated without due process. Understanding inverse condemnation helps illustrate the balance between government regulation and private property rights, which is a key aspect of real estate law.