In the case of conflicting state and federal fair housing laws, what must Katrina do regarding age as a protected class?

In situations where there are conflicting state and federal fair housing laws, the established principle is that individuals must adhere to the more restrictive law. This principle aligns with the understanding that state laws can provide greater protections than federal laws, and when they do, they take precedence to ensure the highest level of protection for individuals.

In the context of age as a protected class, this means that if state law offers additional protections related to age or specific provisions that limit discrimination based on age, these would need to be followed alongside or instead of federal standards. Federal laws provide a baseline of rights, but states have the authority to enhance those protections as they see fit. Therefore, when faced with this scenario, following the more restrictive law is not only legally compliant but also supports the broader goal of fair housing for all.