In real estate contracts, why is freedom from fraud considered an implied condition?

Freedom from fraud is considered an implied condition in real estate contracts because it does not need to be stated explicitly for it to be understood as a foundational aspect of the agreement. In the realm of contracts, particularly in real estate, parties are inherently expected to engage in good faith and honesty. This principle governs the conduct of the parties involved, ensuring that any material misrepresentation or deceit is not tolerated.

Given this understanding, the concept of freedom from fraud is woven into the fabric of contract law; parties can reasonably assume that the transaction is conducted fairly, without deceitful behavior. This implicit understanding reinforces the integrity of the agreement and protects the interests of all parties involved.

The other options do not accurately capture the rationale behind why freedom from fraud is considered an implied condition. For instance, while it might be assumed, it's specifically the absence of the need for explicit mention that validates its status as an implied condition. Similarly, this condition does not contradict buyer rights nor is it irrelevant, as it plays a crucial role in maintaining trust and validity in contractual relationships.