If Regina's property purchase did not include mineral rights, what does this imply for the buyer of those rights?

If Regina's property purchase did not include mineral rights, this indicates that the mineral rights are considered separate from the surface rights of the property. When mineral rights are severed from a property, they can be sold or transferred independently. Therefore, if those rights were not included in Regina's purchase, they remain with whoever currently owns them, which may be a previous owner or another party.

In real estate terms, this concept is essential because it clarifies the distinction between surface rights—the rights to use the land above ground—and mineral rights, which pertain to the resources located underground. This separation ensures that surface ownership does not automatically confer ownership of any minerals or resources that lie beneath the surface. Thus, the mineral rights remain severed from Regina’s property, emphasizing their independent status and that she does not have legal claims to them unless explicitly stated otherwise in the transaction.